This meta-motive is concerned with "getting along", friendliness and love, ranging from affiliation to conflictuous/hostility.
This meta-motive is concerned with "getting ahead", autonomy and control, ranging from dominance to submissive.
This meta-motive is concerned with "getting along", friendliness and love, ranging from affiliation to conflictuous/hostility.
This meta-motive is concerned with "getting ahead", autonomy and control, ranging from dominance to submissive.
Leaders show their appreciation for their employees and let them know how important they are, they stimulate through positive communication and listen to employees' opinions.
Leaders include employees in all decisions and processes, they easily accept and incorporate employees' suggestions, and show they understand the feelings and emotions of their employees.
Leaders are very flexible when interacting with employees and hesitate to provide guidance, they tend to put the employees' interest above the company's, and avoid being the centre of attention.
Leaders are personally and professionally absent, tend to avoid confrontations and responsibilities, and act too late when problems arise.
Leaders are suspicious of employees motives, tend to be quick and negative in their judgment, and stay distant from their employees.
Leaders force employees to obey them, tend to be harsh on employees and do not accept criticism.
Leaders try to reach success in a competitive way, tend to actively monitor and correct employees, and behave firmly towards employees.
Leaders stimulate and persuade employees through a clear vision, act decisively when performance and/or organisational problems arise and motivate employees to perform optimally.
Often referred to as transformational styles, Inspirational and Coaching are associated with an interest in higher goals, warmth and the ability to enroll others, motivating, intellectually stimulating and showing consideration to others.
Leaders who use these styles hope to enforce obedience or compliance in their employees. They communicate in a harsh, one-sided manner, without showing much understanding for others.
Overall, this is "non-leadership" or the avoidance of responsibility by the leader. With these styles the leader, certainly in the eyes of the employees, takes action too late, or when problems have already become serious.
The leader allows greater participation and autonomy, supervising from a distance; monitors the results and only takes action when necessary. Leadership researchers refer to this quadrant as "leadership by exception – active".